Case 8001544/2024 · Employment Tribunal
D Newlan v IPSOS Mori UK Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001544/2024
- Decision date
- 20 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McCluskey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
D Newlan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hybrid hearing in Edinburgh on 20 January 2025, Employment Judge McCluskey gave judgment orally. The tribunal held that both the unfair dismissal claim and the claim for failure to provide a written statement of reasons for dismissal were presented outside the applicable time limit.
The tribunal found that it was reasonably practicable for the claims to have been presented in time. On that basis, both claims were dismissed without the tribunal going on to determine the substantive merits of the dismissal complaint or the written statement claim.
No monetary remedy was awarded, and the written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claim was not presented within the applicable time limit and that it was reasonably practicable to do so in time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The claim for failure to provide a written statement of reasons for dismissal was also found to be out of time, and it was reasonably practicable to present it within the limit. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.