Case 8001583/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: Mrs M I Ayala Gragera v ARRIA Data Text Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001583/2024
- Decision date
- 12 November 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: Mrs M I Ayala Gragera
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge J Hendry issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented. The tribunal found that the respondent had unlawfully withheld the claimant's wages for the period May 2024 to August 2024 inclusive and ordered payment of £20,666.80 gross, calculated at £5,166.70 per month.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had not been paid her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £5,484.58 gross, calculated on the basis of 23 days at £238.46 per day. The judgment further records that the claimant had not received a bonus due in August, quantified at £516.67 gross.
The order states that the respondent may deduct income tax and employee national insurance contributions if required by law, provided it remits those sums to HM Revenue and Customs and gives the claimant written evidence of the deductions. The hearing listed for 12 December 2024 at 14.30 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was found to have unlawfully withheld wages for May 2024 to August 2024 inclusive, calculated at £5,166.70 per month. | Upheld | — | £20,667 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement; the amount was calculated as 23 days at £238.46 per day. | Upheld | — | £5,485 |
| Other | The judgment records an unpaid bonus due in August at £516.67 gross; no separate legal label is stated in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £517 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £26,668
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.