Case 8001618/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8001618/2025 Ms I Bouziouri v The City of Edinburgh Council — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001618/2025
- Decision date
- 18 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sangster Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8001618/2025 Ms I Bouziouri
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. It did so on the grounds of non-compliance with an order dated 16 October 2025 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The tribunal recorded that a preliminary hearing fixed for 17 October 2025 had been postponed on the claimant's application, and that orders were issued requiring the claimant to send medical evidence to the tribunal and the respondent. The claimant did not respond, and a reminder was issued on 17 November 2025.
On 19 December 2025 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 12 January 2026, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The tribunal found that no acceptable reason had been given and no hearing had been requested, and therefore struck out the claim.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment strikes out the claim under rule 38 but does not identify the substantive heads of claim in the judgment text. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(c)
- rule 38(1)(d)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.