Case 8001624/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A v BP Exploration Operating Company Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001624/2025
- Decision date
- 11 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge Claimant
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis preliminary hearing dealt with the claimant's application for anonymity and the issue of whether he was disabled at the relevant time. The underlying proceedings included claims of unfair dismissal, breach of contract, failure to pay holiday pay and disability discrimination, all denied by the respondent, but the Tribunal stated that this judgment was limited to disability status and did not decide knowledge of disability or the other substantive claims.
The Tribunal made an anonymity order limited to this disability hearing and any future reconsideration hearing dealing with disability. Applying Rule 49 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024 and balancing open justice against the claimant's Article 8 privacy rights, it found that the medical evidence was intrusive and that publication of the claimant's name would disclose private medical information, while limiting the order to this judgment reduced the effect on open justice.
On disability, the Tribunal found that the claimant's May 2023 hospital admission and early 2024 blood pressure episodes did not establish a disability at those times. It accepted that the position changed in April and May 2024, after continuing symptoms and the diagnosis of a brain aneurysm. The Tribunal accepted evidence that the claimant was extremely ill for months, was bedridden for a period, required nurse visits and a drug protocol, and had to avoid stress and limit ordinary activities including household tasks and helping children with homework.
The Tribunal held that from 15 May 2024 the claimant had a physical or mental impairment with a substantial and long-term adverse effect on normal day-to-day activities within the Equality Act 2010. It also found that medical treatment moderated the symptoms of high blood pressure and that, but for that treatment, substantial adverse effects would have continued. It followed that disability discrimination claims relating to alleged discrimination before 15 May 2024 had no prospect of success and should be dismissed. No remedy was awarded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Preliminary hearing only. The Tribunal found the claimant was disabled under the Equality Act from 15 May 2024 onwards. It stated that any disability discrimination claims relating to alleged discrimination before that date had no prospect of success and should be dismissed; the merits of disability discrimination after that date were not determined. | Other | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
7 references- Rule 49 of the Employment Tribunal Rules 2024
- Article 8
- section 6 of the Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 of the Equality Act 2010
- section 212 of the Equality Act 2010
- J v DLA Piper
- Fallows v Newsgroup Newspapers Ltd [2016] ICR 801
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.