Case 8001629/2025 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001629/2025 Heard in Aberdeen on 17, & November 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss J Kesson v Lifeways Group — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001629/2025
- Decision date
- 19 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001629/2025 Heard in Aberdeen on 17, & November 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Miss J Kesson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss J Kesson brought claims under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010 for victimisation against The Lifeways Group. The written judgment states that, for reasons given orally at the hearing on 19 November 2025, those claims were not well-founded and were dismissed.
No monetary award or other remedy is recorded in the judgment. The judgment does not set out the oral reasons, identify a protected characteristic, or record any lay panel members.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment states that the claims made under s.27 of the Equality Act 2010 (victimisation) were not well-founded and were dismissed. It does not identify a protected characteristic. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.