Case 8001715/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8001715/2024 J Bruce v St Philips Care Caledonia Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001715/2024
- Decision date
- 24 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8001715/2024 J Bruce
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment states that the Tribunal had given the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 13 June 2025, or to request a hearing so that the question of strike-out could be considered.
The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal made no merits findings and instead struck out the claim. The extracted judgment does not specify the underlying claim type or any monetary remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim type; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) actively pursued
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.