Case 8001725/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Lai v Anniesland Mansion Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001725/2024
- Decision date
- 17 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Mannion
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Lai
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the CVP hearing on 6 January 2025, Employment Judge E Mannion ordered the first respondent, Anniesland Mansion Ltd, to pay Miss A Lai a total of £2,412. The judgment states that this sum reflected non-payment of wages and non-payment of national minimum wage.
The judgment also states that the award reflected non-payment of accrued but untaken annual leave. An oral judgment together with oral reasons was given at the conclusion of the hearing, and no written note of reasons was attached to the judgment sent to the parties on 17 January 2025.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered payment of £2,412, and stated that the sum reflected non-payment of wages and non-payment of national minimum wage. The judgment did not apportion the award between heads. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal stated that the £2,412 award also reflected non-payment of accrued but untaken annual leave. The judgment did not apportion the award between heads. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,412
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.