Case 8001734/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages and holiday-pay claims against The Good Hood Wirral Ltd
No response was presented to the claim. Under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, Employment Judge P O’Donnell issued judgment on the available material without a hearing.
- Case reference
- 8001734/2025
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Hughes
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, Employment Judge P O’Donnell issued judgment on the available material without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,849.80 gross. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £293.04 gross, calculated as 24 hours at £12.21 per hour.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,849.80 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,850 |
| Holiday pay | The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of £293.04 for unpaid holiday entitlement, stated as 24 hours x £12.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £293 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,143
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.