Case 8001747/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Magillan Sheridan v Past Due Credit Solutions — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001747/2025
- Decision date
- 30 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Magillan Sheridan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Glasgow on 22 January 2026, Employment Judge L Doherty considered only whether Ms Magillan Sheridan was disabled for the purposes of section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The claimant relied on asthma and allergies, and the relevant period identified by the tribunal was 24 April 2025 to 6 June 2025.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had asthma and allergies. It relied on her evidence, a GP letter confirming asthma, and GP records showing that she attended her GP in June 2020 and was prescribed an inhaler. The tribunal found her generally credible and reliable, and accepted that she had had asthma and allergies to environmental triggers since childhood. It also accepted that she used daily Fexofenadine, used an inhaler as required, and adopted coping measures such as keeping her home dust free and wearing a face mask when travelling or shopping.
Applying section 6 Equality Act 2010 and Schedule 1, the tribunal considered the effect of the impairments ignoring treatment. It found that, without medication and other measures, the claimant would have difficulty breathing and would be unable to speak coherently, with speech becoming noticeably incoherent, and that her ability to walk and exercise would also be affected. The tribunal held that the effect on speech was more than minor or trivial and therefore substantial.
The tribunal further found that the effects were long term because the claimant had had the impairments since childhood and had been prescribed Fexofenadine for about six years. It therefore concluded that the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, and the case was to proceed to a final hearing as previously directed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary issue only: the tribunal determined that the claimant was disabled within section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 6 Equality Act 2010
- Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- paragraph 5(1) of Schedule 1 Equality Act 2010
- Guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of Disability
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.