Case 8001755/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Erin Phairs v Represented by: Mr B Dawes - Trade Union Representative The Secretary of State for the Home Department — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001755/2025
- Decision date
- 18 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Cowen
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Erin Phairs
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant worked for the respondent as an Executive Officer and had disabilities accepted by the respondent for the purposes of s.6 Equality Act. The hearing concerned allegations that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments by not allowing short-notice home working when health conditions made office attendance difficult, and by not allowing remote working without an office attendance requirement.
The tribunal found that the claimant already had substantial adjustments, including working in the office only 3 out of 8 days per fortnight and other workplace adjustments. It concluded that allowing the claimant to work from home as much as she wanted would not be a reasonable adjustment because it would require short-notice changes to workload and rostering, and that the hybrid working policy had in effect already been disapplied sufficiently to remove the substantial disadvantage.
The tribunal also found that the claims were presented out of time because the claimant knew on 13 March 2025 that her application for reasonable adjustments had been denied but did not start ACAS early conciliation until 19 June 2025. It found no basis to extend time on a just and equitable basis, and stated that the claims lacked merit in any event.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Failure to make reasonable adjustments contrary to s.21 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal dismissed the claims, finding the requested adjustments were not reasonable and that the claims were out of time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | The parties confirmed at the start of the hearing that the s.15 Equality Act claims had been withdrawn. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.21 Equality Act 2010
- s.15 Equality Act
- s.6 EQA
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.