Case 8001777/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case Number: 8001777/2024 G Elrick v Bilfinger UK Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001777/2024
- Decision date
- 13 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge N M Hosie Case Number: 8001777/2024 G Elrick
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt only with a disability discrimination claim brought by G Elrick against Bilfinger UK Limited. On 10 January 2025, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 31 January 2025 or to request a hearing about why the claim should not be struck out.
The claimant did not give an acceptable reason why the claim should not be struck out and did not request a hearing. The tribunal therefore struck out the disability discrimination claim only under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The judgment records that the strike out was made on the grounds that the claim was scandalous, vexatious, and had no reasonable prospect of success. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal struck out the disability discrimination claim only under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated grounds were that the claim was scandalous, vexatious, and had no reasonable prospect of success under Rule 38(1)(a). | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 38(1)(a) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.