Case 8001790/2024 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001790/2024 T Empey v I Younis st and 1 other — 2024
- Case reference
- 8001790/2024
- Decision date
- 9 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
3 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001790/2024 T Empey
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. The case was brought by T Empey against I Younis and MJU (PR Consultants) Limited.
The Employment Judge found that the 2nd respondent, MJU (PR Consultants) Limited, had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. The judgment records that the deduction concerned the cumulative net sum due for the pay periods ending 30 June 2024 and 31 July 2024.
The tribunal ordered the 2nd respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £3,110.92. No other claim type, liability issue, or separate remedy component is recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal found that the 2nd respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the net sum due for the pay periods ending 30 June 2024 and 31 July 2024. | Upheld | — | £3,111 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,111
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.