Case 8001793/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Rae v The Rangers Football Club Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001793/2025
- Decision date
- 8 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Rae
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge L Doherty determined the case on the available material. The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of the bonus payment, and ordered the respondent to pay damages of £10,000.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,461.52 gross, described in the judgment as 8 days. No separate findings were recorded on discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Rule 22 judgment on the available material; the tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of the bonus payment and awarded damages of £10,000. | Upheld | — | £10,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,461.52 gross, described as 8 days. | Upheld | — | £2,462 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,462
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £10,000
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.