Case 8001856/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Birrell v Vericall Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001856/2025
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Walker
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Birrell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 22 October 2025, Employment Judge S Walker struck out Mr C Birrell's claim against Vericall Ltd under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify any substantive liability findings on the pleaded claims; it deals only with case management and strike-out.
The reasons record that on 2 September 2025 the Tribunal asked the claimant for further specification of the claim, with a view to issuing a judgment under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. No reply was received. A further reminder was sent on 18 September 2025, again with no response from the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not specify the underlying pleaded heads of claim; it records only that the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.