Case 8001909/2025 · Employment Tribunal
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Undefended Case No: 8001909/2025 Heard at Edinburgh on the Cloud Based Video Platform on January 2026 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Mr Declan Redgrave v New Town Fox — 2026
- Case reference
- 8001909/2025
- Decision date
- 28 January 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
ETZ 4(WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Judgment of the Employment Tribunal in Undefended Case No: 8001909/2025 Heard at Edinburgh on the Cloud Based Video Platform on January 2026 Employment Judge J G d’Inverno Mr Declan Redgrave
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that New Town Fox employed Mr Declan Redgrave from 14 July 2019 until 25 April 2025. After the business lost the Dublin Street premises on 7 March 2025, the claimant continued working from the Dundas Street premises, was content to do so, and had no intention of ending the employment. He took planned leave from 7 April 2025.
When his pay was not paid into his bank account, and when he was told on 25 April 2025 that his name did not appear on any rota for further work, the tribunal held that the respondent's non-payment of wages and failure to roster him amounted to termination without notice under section 95(1)(a) ERA 1996 on 25 April 2025. The respondent did not appear and did not show that the reason for dismissal was one of the potentially fair reasons in section 98 ERA 1996, so the dismissal was unfair.
The tribunal awarded a basic award of 3138.50, a compensatory award of 2343.75 for continuing net loss of wages from 25 April until 12 May 2025, and 2467.10 for five weeks' statutory notice entitlement. It also found that as at the effective date of termination the claimant had 276 hours of carried-forward and accrued untaken paid annual leave, valued at 3256.80 net at 11.06 per hour, less 430.70 already received, leaving 2826.10 payable. The claimant secured new employment on 12 May 2025 at a higher salary, which ended the continuing wage loss.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The dismissal award comprised a basic award of 3138.50, a compensatory award of 2343.75 for continuing net wage loss to 12 May 2025, and 2467.10 for five weeks' statutory notice. | Upheld | — | £7,949 |
| Working time regulations | The tribunal awarded compensation for accrued but untaken paid annual leave entitlement as at the effective date of termination, net of 430.70 already paid. | Upheld | — | £2,826 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £10,775
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,139
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £2,344
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 95(1)(a) ERA 1996
- section 98 ERA 1996
- section 86(1)(b) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.