Case 8001997/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001997/2024 (V)5 Held on February 2025 and April 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mrs J Fryer v Highlands and Islands Airports Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8001997/2024
- Decision date
- 3 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8001997/2024 (V)5 Held on February 2025 and April 2025 Employment Judge J M Hendry Mrs J Fryer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard a strike-out application under Rule 38(1)(a) and also considered the claimant's proposed amendment. It recorded that the claimant could not bring unfair dismissal or constructive unfair dismissal claims because she did not have two years' qualifying service, and treated the live case as a breach of contract claim based on being asked to do work said to be outside her job description and on the way she was treated between June and September 2024.
On the express-term case, the tribunal relied on the claimant's contract and job description, which stated that her job title conveyed the broad nature of the work and that she could be required to work in other functional areas as required. It found that the claimant, employed as a Procurement Advisor, was given a lawful instruction within her contractual duties when asked to assist with procurement work for other parts of the business. It therefore held that there was no arguable breach of an express term and struck that claim out as having no reasonable prospect of success.
On the implied term of trust and confidence, the tribunal accepted that the pleaded material left open the possibility of an arguable breach, including the claimant's account of reassurances, restructuring, stress and sickness absence. It then held that any claim for psychiatric injury was outside the jurisdiction of the employment tribunal under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994, and that such a claim could not be cured by amendment. It also held that a claim for loss of wages or other contingent post-termination losses could not be determined by the tribunal. The implied-term claim and the loss-of-wages head were therefore struck out, and no monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Alleged breach of an express written term, relying on clause 3.1 and the job description. The tribunal held the contract allowed work in other functional areas and found no arguable breach. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Alleged breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence. The tribunal said there was at least a possible arguable basis on the pleaded facts, but any claim for psychiatric injury was outside its jurisdiction and could not be cured by amendment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Claim for loss of wages said to flow from the alleged breach. The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to determine contingent post-termination losses. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 38(1)(a) no reasonable prospect of success
- two-stage strike-out test
- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (Scotland) Order 1994 art. 3(c)
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.