Case 8002008/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8002008/2024 (V)5 Held on and April 2025 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss B Phillips v Respondent — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002008/2024
- Decision date
- 14 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
1 namedClaimant
E.T. Z (WR) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 8002008/2024 (V)5 Held on and April 2025 Employment Judge N M Hosie Miss B Phillips
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, giving reasons orally at the hearing, found that Miss B Phillips was an employee of Skelbo Global Ventures Ltd within s.230(1) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. On that basis, the tribunal held that it had jurisdiction to consider her unfair dismissal complaint.
The extracted judgment does not record any determination of the substantive unfair dismissal complaint itself, and it does not set out any remedy or monetary award. It is therefore a jurisdiction decision rather than a liability or remedy judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that the claimant was an employee of the respondent within s.230(1) Employment Rights Act 1996 and therefore had jurisdiction to consider her unfair dismissal complaint. No merits determination or remedy is recorded in the extracted text. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.