Case 8002035/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Thomson v Resolve Phb Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002035/2025
- Decision date
- 2 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Thomson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued on the material available because the respondent presented no response to the claim. Employment Judge M Robison determined the case for Mr R Thomson against Resolve PHB Ltd on 2 October 2025.
The tribunal upheld a breach of contract claim in respect of notice and awarded damages of £1,032 net, calculated as 3 weeks at £344 per week. It also upheld a redundancy payment claim, finding that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to £600, calculated as 1.5 weeks at £400 per week.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,600 gross, calculated as 20 days at £80 per day. The judgment does not record any separate award for interest, and the monetary awards recorded in the decision total £3,232.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal awarded damages for notice pay in the net sum of £1,032, calculated as 3 weeks x £344. | Upheld | — | £1,032 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and awarded a redundancy payment of £600, calculated as 1.5 weeks x £400. | Upheld | — | £600 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,600, calculated as 20 days x £80. | Upheld | — | £1,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,232
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.