Case 8002066/2024 · Employment Tribunal
B Hunter v Timberworx Manufactured Joinery Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002066/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
B Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, so Employment Judge S MacLean issued judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent, Timberworx Manufactured Joinery Ltd, to pay £2,886. The judgment records that this figure represented 4 weeks' gross pay at £18.50 per hour, based on 39 hours worked per week.
The tribunal also upheld the claim that the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,587.30. The judgment states that this sum represented 11 days' accrued but untaken annual leave. The total monetary award recorded by the judgment is £4,473.30.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal, proceeding under rule 22 on the available material because no response was presented, found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,886, described as 4 weeks' gross pay at £18.50 per hour based on 39 hours worked per week. | Upheld | — | £2,886 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £1,587.30, described as 11 days' accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £1,587 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,473
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.