Case 8002075/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8002075/2024 M Asghar v Next level security Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002075/2024
- Decision date
- 31 July 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8002075/2024 M Asghar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 13 May 2025, the Tribunal ordered the claimant to notify it within 28 days whether he intended to continue with the claim. No response was received, and the Tribunal issued reminders on 12 June, 20 June and 2 July 2025.
On 14 July 2025, the Tribunal gave the claimant a further opportunity to provide written reasons by 28 July 2025, or to request a hearing, to explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason, or any reason, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued. No merits determination or remedy award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | The claim was struck out under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 for not being actively pursued, after no response to the Tribunal's directions and reminders. The judgment does not determine the substantive merits of the underlying claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.