Case 8002095/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8002095/2025 Mrs A Spence v Fka Textiles Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002095/2025
- Decision date
- 10 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Macleod Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8002095/2025 Mrs A Spence
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Macleod issued judgment under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because no response had been presented to the claim. On the available material, the tribunal made three findings in the claimant’s favour: that Mrs A Spence was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, that she was dismissed by reason of redundancy, and that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay damages of £3,125.75 for the breach of contract claim, a redundancy payment of £4,688.64, and £781.44 for unpaid holiday entitlement. The total amount ordered was £8,595.83.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £3,125.75. | Upheld | — | £3,126 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,688.64. | Upheld | — | £4,689 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered £781.44. | Upheld | — | £781 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,596
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.