Case 8002145/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Bremner v No appearance or representation Jewel Miners Welfare Society — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002145/2024
- Decision date
- 14 March 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Bremner
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningA final hearing was listed for 12, 13 and 14 March 2025 after notice was sent by email on 21 January 2025. When the hearing began on 12 March 2025, neither party was present or represented. The tribunal clerk attempted to contact both parties. On behalf of the respondent, Mr Caven replied by telephone and said the email address used for him on the ET3 had one letter transposed, so he had not received the hearing notification.
Attempts to contact Ms Bremner were unsuccessful. The clerk left telephone messages for her and emailed her at the address on the ET1, but no response was received. The tribunal checked the case file and found no contact from the claimant after the hearing notice was issued. It also noted an order dated 17 January 2025 requiring the claimant to provide a schedule of loss within 14 days, with nothing on the file to show that she had done so.
Having regard to the claimant's failure to attend, her failure to respond to telephone and email messages, and her earlier failure to comply with the order, Employment Judge R Mackay dismissed the claim under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2024. The judgment records no substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented; no merits determination was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented; no separate merits finding on redundancy entitlement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented; the tribunal did not determine the merits. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Dismissed under Rule 47 for failure to attend or be represented; no substantive working time findings were made. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.