Case 8002200/2024 · Employment Tribunal
M Robison Mr A Wallace v Not present New Gorbals Housing Association Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002200/2024
- Decision date
- 16 June 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ms
Parties
2 namedClaimant
M Robison Mr A Wallace
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented claims on 23 December 2024 for unfair dismissal, redundancy pay, notice pay, holiday pay and arrears of pay. By notice and order dated 28 January 2025, the tribunal indicated that the unfair dismissal and redundancy payment complaints would be dismissed unless written representations were received, because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' service. No response was received, and those claims were confirmed dismissed as at 11 February 2025.
The tribunal then managed the remaining claims by asking the claimant to clarify whether holiday pay was still sought and to specify what sums were claimed for arrears of pay and notice pay. The claimant said no holiday pay was due, later stated he was only looking for notice pay and unfair dismissal, and later said he wanted 4 weeks' sick days, 4 weeks' notice pay and 4 weeks for unfair dismissal. He repeatedly failed to provide the ordered calculations, documents and schedule of loss, and did not respond to the tribunal's reminders and warnings.
On the day of the final hearing the claimant did not attend. He told the clerk he had forgotten about the hearing, was outside and could not connect by video, and said he would be happy taking a week's wage and calling it a day. The tribunal found that the claim had not been actively pursued for the purposes of rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 and exercised its discretion to strike out the outstanding claim, taking account of the repeated failures to comply, the lack of engagement after 20 April 2025, and the failure to attend the hearing.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed on 11 February 2025 under rule 28(1) because the claimant did not have the requisite two years' service and he did not make written representations by the deadline. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | Dismissed on 11 February 2025 under rule 28(1) on the same procedural basis as the unfair dismissal complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The claimant said on 3 March 2025 that no holiday pay was due and later confirmed he was only looking for notice pay and unfair dismissal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The outstanding notice pay claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue, after repeated non-compliance with orders and failure to attend the hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The outstanding arrears of pay claim was struck out under rule 38(1)(d) for failure actively to pursue, following repeated failures to provide particulars, a schedule of loss, and attendance at the final hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 28(1) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective to deal with cases fairly and justly
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.