Case 8002222/2025 · Employment Tribunal
J Robertson v Coille Haulage Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002222/2025
- Decision date
- 13 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
J Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out J Robertson's claim against Coille Haulage Ltd (In Liquidation) under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action and records no determination on their merits.
The respondent was in compulsory liquidation. The claimant was notified on 16 September 2025 of the need to obtain the court's consent under the Insolvency Act 1986 for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, but no consent was obtained. The claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's requests of 20 March and 13 April 2026, or to its invitation of 23 April 2026 to explain by 7 May 2026 why the claim should not be struck out. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause or causes of action; it strikes out the claim in its entirety without determining its merits. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.