Case 8002285/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G S Dhindsa v Chilli Flames Fast Food Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002285/2025
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G S Dhindsa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment under rule 22 on the available material for the monetary parts of the claim only. The tribunal held that Chilli Flames Fast Food Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr G S Dhindsa's wages for the period 4 April to 4 July 2025.
For that wages claim, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £2,284.70 gross. The figure was stated to be based on 537.5 hours at £12.21 per hour, less payment received of £4,278.18.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £792.14, calculated by reference to 64.876 hours at £12.21 per hour. The total monetary award on the judgment was £3,076.84.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £2,284.70 gross, calculated as 537.5 hours at £12.21 per hour for 4 April to 4 July 2025 less payment received of £4,278.18. | Upheld | — | £2,285 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £792.14, calculated as 64.876 hours at £12.21 per hour. | Upheld | — | £792 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,077
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.