Case 8002294/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Number: 8002294/2025 Mr B Fleming v NRS Healthcare Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002294/2025
- Decision date
- 29 June 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Case
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Number: 8002294/2025 Mr B Fleming
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Mr B Fleming's claim against NRS Healthcare Limited (In Liquidation) under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claim had not been actively pursued. On 23 October 2025, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant explaining that court consent was required to proceed. No reply was received. The claimant also did not reply to a request for an update sent on 29 April 2026 or a further reminder sent on 18 May 2026.
On 10 June 2026, the Tribunal issued a strike-out warning giving the claimant until 24 June 2026 to respond or explain why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not respond, provide reasons against strike-out or request a hearing. The claim was struck out without a decision on its substantive merits. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim type. The operative judgment strikes out the claim, although paragraph 3 of the reasons refers to striking out the response. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.