Case 8002303/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Dron v Clyde Waste Solutions Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002303/2025
- Decision date
- 27 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Dron
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge M Robison decided to issue judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The Tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages of £1,320.00 gross (82.5 hours x £16.00/hour) and had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement of £480.00 gross (30 hours x £16.00/hour). The total payable is therefore £1,800.00 gross, although the judgment does not state an explicit aggregate figure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Unauthorised deduction from wages: 82.5 hours x £16.00/hour = £1,320 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,320 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Unpaid holiday entitlement: 30 hours x £16.00/hour = £480 gross. | Upheld | — | £480 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,800
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.