Case 8002321/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Earley v Flying Scot (Glasgow) Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002321/2025
- Decision date
- 16 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Wiseman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Earley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, Employment Judge L Wiseman issued judgment on the available material for the monetary parts of the claim only.
The tribunal found that Flying Scot (Glasgow) Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs S Earley’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £612.50 gross, described in the judgment as one week’s pay.
The tribunal also found that Mrs S Earley was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered the respondent to pay damages of £612.50 gross, also described as one week’s pay. The judgment records no further remedy breakdown beyond these two gross sums.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £612.50 gross, described as 1 week. | Upheld | — | £613 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £612.50 gross, described as 1 week. | Upheld | — | £613 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,225
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.