Case 8002339/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Mallan v Water Row Company Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002339/2025
- Decision date
- 22 October 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S Neilson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Mallan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case called at Glasgow on 16 October 2025 for a preliminary hearing on the claimant’s application for interim relief under section 128 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant did not attend. The respondent was represented by Mr Briggs, Advocate.
After a telephone enquiry to the claimant, the tribunal established that he had decided to withdraw the interim relief application. That position was confirmed by an email received at 10.20 a.m. in which the claimant said he was withdrawing the interim relief claim but wished to continue with the remainder of his claim.
The tribunal therefore dismissed the application for interim relief. The dismissal was expressly without prejudice to the remainder of the claim, which was to proceed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Application for interim relief under section 128 ERA 1996. The claimant did not attend, confirmed by telephone and email that he was withdrawing the interim relief application, and the tribunal dismissed it without prejudice to the remainder of the claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Section 128 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.