Case 8002346/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Kay v Design & Print Solutions Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002346/2025
- Decision date
- 10 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Kay
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The case was before the Employment Tribunal in Scotland, with S MacLean sitting alone.
The tribunal found that Mr J Kay had been dismissed by reason of redundancy. On that basis, the tribunal held that he was entitled to a redundancy payment. The judgment records the calculation as 15 weeks at £203.08, multiplied by 1.5, producing an award of £4,569.30.
No other claim type, remedy component, or legal issue is recorded in the judgment text supplied. The decision is confined to the redundancy payment entitlement and amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The respondent stated that no part of the claim was contested. The Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 and held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £4,569.30. | Upheld | — | £4,569 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,569
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.