Case 8002361/2025 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 8002361/2025 M Khan v Umega Letting and Estate agents — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002361/2025
- Decision date
- 2 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Employment Judge d’Inverno Case Number: 8002361/2025 M Khan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 17 November the tribunal directed the claimant to provide further information. No response was received, and reminders were issued on 27 November, 9 December 2025 and 23 December 2025.
On 7 January 2026 the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 21 January 2026, or to request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out. The claimant did not provide an acceptable reason and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 on the ground that it had not been actively pursued, within rule 38(1)(d). The judgment was entered in the register on 2 February 2026.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a single strike-out of 'the claim' under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; it does not give separate findings for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records a single strike-out of 'the claim' under rule 38(1)(d) for not being actively pursued; it does not give separate findings for this head. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.