Case 8002386/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Alastair Edgar v Triple R Garage Services Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002386/2025
- Decision date
- 3 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Alastair Edgar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so Employment Judge A Kemp issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The tribunal found that Triple R Garage Services Ltd had failed to pay Mr Alastair Edgar’s holiday entitlement and treated that failure as an unauthorised deduction from wages.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the gross sum of £1,200, calculated as 8 days' holiday at £150 per day. The claim for interest was rejected. The judgment also provided that the respondent could deduct any required Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions before payment, provided the deductions were remitted to HMRC and the claimant was given written evidence of them.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and described this as an unauthorised deduction from wages. The separate claim for interest was rejected. | Upheld | — | £1,200 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,200
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.