Case 8002413/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr I McBride v GB Grove Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002413/2025
- Decision date
- 19 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R Mackay
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr I McBride
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dismissed Mr I McBride's claim of constructive unfair dismissal. The written judgment does not record the underlying findings or reasoning because the reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The Tribunal upheld the claim of unlawful deduction from wages and ordered GB Grove Limited to pay Mr McBride £2,391.99. It also upheld the claim for unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of £1,198.60. The holiday-pay award was stated to be gross, with the respondent liable to account to HMRC for any income tax or National Insurance contributions due before payment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The written judgment records that the constructive unfair dismissal claim failed and was dismissed; the reasons were given orally at the hearing. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,392 |
| Holiday pay | The award was stated as a gross sum, with the respondent liable to account to HMRC for any income tax or National Insurance contributions due before payment. | Upheld | — | £1,199 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,591
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.