Case 8002439/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J McMullan v AMR Motorcycles Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002439/2025
- Decision date
- 28 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Campbell
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J McMullan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting in Glasgow by CVP on 18 May 2026 with Employment Judge Campbell, recorded that AMR Motorcycles Limited was not present or represented. Mr J McMullan appeared in person. The judgment held that the complaints of unlawful deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and failure to provide payment for accrued annual leave on termination under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 were successful.
The tribunal also upheld the claimant's breach of contract complaint at common law in respect of failure to provide notice of termination of employment, his complaint of failure to provide a written statement of key employment particulars under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, and his unfair dismissal complaint under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The respondent was ordered to pay £3,326.77 in respect of unlawfully deducted wages and failure to pay accrued annual leave, £549.45 for breach of contract through failure to provide notice, £1,098.90 for failure to provide a compliant written statement of employment particulars, and £879.14 as compensation for unfair dismissal. The judgment stated that the sums were calculated on a gross basis and were subject to reduction for any lawful deductions.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment gives a combined award of £3,326.77 for unlawfully deducted wages and failure to pay accrued annual leave, without splitting the amount between those complaints. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment gives a combined award of £3,326.77 for unlawfully deducted wages and failure to pay accrued annual leave, without splitting the amount between those complaints. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract at common law in respect of failure to provide notice of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £549 |
| Other | Failure to provide a written statement of key employment particulars under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002. | Upheld | — | £1,099 |
| Unfair dismissal | Unfair dismissal under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £879 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,854
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 38 of the Employment Act 2002
- section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.