Case 8002465/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Davidson v Campsie Retail Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002465/2025
- Decision date
- 17 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Davidson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that Campsie Retail Ltd employed Paul Davidson throughout his employment, from January 2020 until 30 April 2025, at the Dr Fix unit in Union Square, Aberdeen. It rejected the respondent's argument that his employer had changed to Kilwinnet Retail Ltd and then The Wee Engraving Company Limited. Payment of wages through those associated companies did not itself change the employer. No written notification of a change was proved, no statement of employment particulars had been supplied, and Campsie issued the final two payslips. Where the evidence differed, the tribunal preferred Davidson's account, which was supported by documents.
The Dr Fix business closed on 30 April 2025 after attempts to find alternative premises or sell the business failed. The tribunal found that redundancy was the sole reason for Davidson's dismissal. He had received no statutory redundancy payment. His claim for that payment was within the tribunal's jurisdiction and succeeded.
The notice-pay claim, brought as a breach of contract claim, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Davidson began ACAS early conciliation on 6 August 2025, after the deadline of 29 July 2025, and presented his claim on 14 October 2025. His only explanation for the delay was that he had sought an amicable resolution. Even applying a liberal interpretation of the reasonable practicability test in his favour, the tribunal found that he could have checked the deadline and begun conciliation in time while still seeking agreement. He therefore failed to establish that timely commencement was not reasonably practicable.
The tribunal awarded £2,846.25 in statutory redundancy pay. Davidson's earnings varied with his hours, and the pay evidence was limited. The tribunal used his April 2025 gross monthly pay of £1,644.50 to establish a week's pay of £379.50 and applied the statutory formula. It acknowledged that fuller records might have produced a slightly higher weekly figure. No notice-pay award was made.
The tribunal also considered a possible financial penalty under section 12A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. It described the failure to pay redundancy as wholly unreasonable and provisionally identified possible aggravating features, including reliance on the absence of documents the employer was required to provide. It gave Campsie 14 days to submit arguments and evidence, including evidence of its ability to pay, before deciding whether to impose a penalty. Voluntary payment of five weeks' notice pay would weigh substantially in the respondent's favour. No penalty was imposed in this judgment; any later penalty would be payable to the Secretary of State.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,846 |
| Breach of contract | The notice-pay claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction because it was brought out of time. The claimant did not establish that commencing it in time was not reasonably practicable. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,846
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
13 references- Employment Rights Act 1996, ss. 139, 155, 162, 163 and 164
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s. 230
- Clark v Harney Westwood & Riegels [2021] IRLR 528
- Employment Rights Act 1996, ss. 1 and 4
- Employment Tribunals (Extension of Jurisdiction) (Scotland) Order 1994, regulations 7 and 8B: not reasonably practicable test
- Porter v Bandridge Ltd [1978] IRLR 271
- Palmer and Saunders v Southend on Sea Borough Council [1984] IRLR 119
- Asda Stores Ltd v Kauser UKEAT/0165/07
- Marks and Spencer plc v Williams-Ryan [2005] IRLR 562
- Lowri Beck Services Ltd v Brophy [2019] EWCA Civ 2490
- Employment Rights Act 1996, Part XVI, Chapter II: calculation of a week's pay
- Employment Rights Act 1996, s. 86
- Employment Tribunals Act 1996, s. 12A: aggravating features and ability to pay
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.