Case 8002470/2025 · Employment Tribunal
A Brierley v Spudshack Matcha Man Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002470/2025
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge F Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
A Brierley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge F Eccles issued judgment under rule 22 on the available material. The tribunal found that Spudshack Matcha Man Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from A Brierley’s wages. The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £115.58. No other claim, legal test, or separate remedy component was recorded in the judgment text provided.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 22 on the available material because no response was presented. | Upheld | — | £116 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £116
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.