Case 8002471/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Respondent — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002471/2025
- Decision date
- 3 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp
- Venue
- Aberdeen
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Nicole Sheila Whyatt claimed constructive unfair dismissal under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, alleging that Cygnus Enterprises Ltd's handling of her grievance and appeal breached the implied term of trust and confidence. The Tribunal found that the grievance investigation was inadequate: relevant allegations were not put in detail to witnesses, some discussions were not recorded, existing interview notes and supporting documents were not supplied to the claimant, and the appeal was not progressed after she agreed to proceed.
The Tribunal held that, viewed cumulatively, the handling of the grievance and appeal amounted to a material breach of contract which seriously damaged or destroyed the relationship of trust and confidence. It found that the claimant was entitled to resign in response to that breach.
The Tribunal nevertheless held that the claimant affirmed the contract. She gave three months' notice on 30 September 2025, submitted fit notes and received statutory sick pay from the respondent during October and November, while working for another employer from approximately mid-October without informing the respondent or her GP. Considering those matters together, the Tribunal found that affirmation had occurred, so the claimant was not dismissed within section 95(1)(c). The constructive dismissal claim was dismissed, and no remedy was awarded or assessed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The Tribunal found a material breach of contract in the handling of the claimant's grievance and appeal, but held that she affirmed the breach and therefore was not dismissed under section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Fairness and remedy were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating Ltd v Sharp constructive dismissal test
- Malik v BCCI implied term of trust and confidence
- W A Goold (Pearmak) Ltd v McConnell implied grievance term
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust final-straw test
- Mari (Colmar) v Reuters Ltd and W E Cox Toner (International) Ltd v Crook affirmation analysis
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.