Case 8002481/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Doherty v The Co-Operative Group Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002481/2025
- Decision date
- 18 May 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Doherty
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Doherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal dismissed Mr L Doherty's claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. It also dismissed his claims under sections 19 and 19A of that Act.
The judgment states that summary reasons were provided orally. It records no written factual findings or further reasoning and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex discrimination | Claim under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic; sex is assigned from the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim under section 19 of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic; sex is assigned from the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
| Sex discrimination | Claim under section 19A of the Equality Act 2010. The judgment does not identify the protected characteristic; sex is assigned from the supplied gov.uk listing category. | Dismissed | Sex | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Section 13 of the Equality Act 2010
- Section 19 of the Equality Act 2010
- Section 19A of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.