Case 8002498/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Miss I Saidi v Plato’S Coffeehouse Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002498/2025
- Decision date
- 10 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge P O’Donnell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss I Saidi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 22 judgment issued by Employment Judge P O'Donnell on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. Miss I Saidi brought claims against Plato's Coffeehouse 1 Ltd. The tribunal upheld the claim that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,474.64 gross for the period February to June 2025.
The tribunal also upheld the claim that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £537.24 gross in respect of 44 hours. No discrimination, dismissal, or other heads of claim are identified in the judgment text. The total monetary award recorded from the two orders is £2,011.88 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 22 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal ordered payment of £1,474.64 gross for the period February to June 2025. The extracted text shows the amount as '£1,474,64', which is read as £1,474.64. | Upheld | — | £1,475 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 22 judgment; no response was presented. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £537.24 gross for 44 hours. | Upheld | — | £537 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,012
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.