Case 8002583/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Akhtar v Majestic By Eliza Ltd — 2025
- Case reference
- 8002583/2025
- Decision date
- 23 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Akhtar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was decided by Employment Judge D Hoey under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, no response having been presented by the respondent. The judgment was issued on the available material without a hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £87.50, calculated as 7 hours at £12.50 per hour. The tribunal further found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to the outstanding redundancy payment balance of £1,406.25 gross.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £87.50 (7 hours x £12.50). Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £88 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to the outstanding redundancy payment balance of £1,406.25 (gross). Rounded to nearest integer GBP. | Upheld | — | £1,406 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,494
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.