Case 8002662/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Wiszynski v Ciao Dolce Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8002662/2025
- Decision date
- 17 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Wiszynski
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Tribunal for Scotland, sitting with Employment Judge L Doherty, struck out the claim under rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The judgment records that the Tribunal first wrote to Mr P Wiszynski on 16 December 2025 seeking further information after the respondent did not lodge an ET3 response form, and no reply was received.
The Tribunal then wrote again on 9 January 2026 and 21 January 2026 reminding the claimant to respond to the earlier correspondence. No reply was received to either letter. On 30 January 2026, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to provide written reasons by 13 February 2026 or request a hearing to consider why the claim should not be struck out for lack of active pursuit, but no reply was received.
On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The extracted text does not record any substantive liability findings on the underlying employment issues and does not record any monetary remedy or award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the substantive heads of claim; the claim was struck out for not being actively pursued under rule 38(1)(d). | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.