Case 8003116/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Pegley v Seismic Image Processing Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8003116/2025
- Decision date
- 17 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Pegley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim. Employment Judge J Hendry issued judgment on the available material under Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by not paying the full wages due between September 2025 and November 2025, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £10,787.99 in respect of underpaid wages. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the correct rate of pension contributions over the same period and ordered payment of £431.51.
The judgment provides that the respondent may deduct from the sums any Income Tax and Employee National Insurance Contributions required by law, provided such deductions are remitted to HMRC and evidenced in writing to the claimant.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages: underpaid wages from September 2025 to November 2025. | Upheld | — | £10,788 |
| Breach of contract | Failure to pay correct rate of pension contributions from September 2025 to November 2025. | Upheld | — | £432 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,220
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.