Case 8003130/2025 · Employment Tribunal
K Morris v Fka Textiles Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 8003130/2025
- Decision date
- 12 February 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge L Doherty
Parties
2 namedClaimant
K Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim by FKA Textiles Ltd. Employment Judge L Doherty decided to issue judgment on the available material under rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The Tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £2,285.62 net (5 weeks x £457.12). It also found that the claimant had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment of £2,926.00 (5 weeks x £585.20). The aggregate is £5,211.62; the judgment does not state an explicit total figure.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Damages for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice: 5 weeks x £457.12 = £2,285.62 net. | Upheld | — | £2,286 |
| Redundancy | Rule 22 default judgment (Scotland). Statutory redundancy payment: 5 weeks x £585.20 = £2,926.00. | Upheld | — | £2,926 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,212
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 22 Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.