Loading…

Race discrimination cases against , and he had persistently expressed his preference for a position with a steady, predictable rotation pattern. 76. The comparison with Chris Shepherd is misconceived. Mr Shepherd was not appointed to the Pool Crew position because the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Race discrimination cases against , and he had persistently expressed his preference for a position with a steady, predictable rotation pattern. 76. The comparison with Chris Shepherd is misconceived. Mr Shepherd was not appointed to the Pool Crew position because the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving race discrimination claims against , and he had persistently expressed his preference for a position with a steady, predictable rotation pattern. 76. The comparison with Chris Shepherd is misconceived. Mr Shepherd was not appointed to the Pool Crew position because the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all race discrimination cases across every employer.

Race discrimination cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All race discrimination cases against , and he had persistently expressed his preference for a position with a steady, predictable rotation pattern. 76. The comparison with Chris Shepherd is misconceived. Mr Shepherd was not appointed to the Pool Crew position because the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8001901/2024	14 August 2026	Scotland	Mr J Katkoria	Race discrimination	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of , and he had persistently expressed his preference for a position with a steady, predictable rotation pattern. 76. The comparison with Chris Shepherd is misconceived. Mr Shepherd was not appointed to the Pool Crew position because the's tribunal cases tagged with race discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.