Loading…

Race discrimination cases against And indeed the point is well made that he was recruited by Mr Flynn, allowed training and experience opportunities by him and was well regarded. Discussion and Decision 118. The question of who must prove what in discrimination claims has been a vexed and contentious issue that has led to considerable legal commentary on the interpretation of the statutory provisions set out in Section of the Equality Act 2010. 119. Before the burden of proof provisions, the leading authority was King v Great British-China Centre. In that case the Court of Appeal in England held that the Tribunal had been entitled to draw an inference of discrimination as the — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Race discrimination cases against And indeed the point is well made that he was recruited by Mr Flynn, allowed training and experience opportunities by him and was well regarded. Discussion and Decision 118. The question of who must prove what in discrimination claims has been a vexed and contentious issue that has led to considerable legal commentary on the interpretation of the statutory provisions set out in Section of the Equality Act 2010. 119. Before the burden of proof provisions, the leading authority was King v Great British-China Centre. In that case the Court of Appeal in England held that the Tribunal had been entitled to draw an inference of discrimination as the

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving race discrimination claims against And indeed the point is well made that he was recruited by Mr Flynn, allowed training and experience opportunities by him and was well regarded. Discussion and Decision 118. The question of who must prove what in discrimination claims has been a vexed and contentious issue that has led to considerable legal commentary on the interpretation of the statutory provisions set out in Section of the Equality Act 2010. 119. Before the burden of proof provisions, the leading authority was King v Great British-China Centre. In that case the Court of Appeal in England held that the Tribunal had been entitled to draw an inference of discrimination as the, out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all race discrimination cases across every employer.

Race discrimination cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All race discrimination cases against And indeed the point is well made that he was recruited by Mr Flynn, allowed training and experience opportunities by him and was well regarded. Discussion and Decision 118. The question of who must prove what in discrimination claims has been a vexed and contentious issue that has led to considerable legal commentary on the interpretation of the statutory provisions set out in Section of the Equality Act 2010. 119. Before the burden of proof provisions, the leading authority was King v Great British-China Centre. In that case the Court of Appeal in England held that the Tribunal had been entitled to draw an inference of discrimination as the

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
8001901/2024	14 August 2026	Scotland	Mr J Katkoria	Race discrimination	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of And indeed the point is well made that he was recruited by Mr Flynn, allowed training and experience opportunities by him and was well regarded. Discussion and Decision 118. The question of who must prove what in discrimination claims has been a vexed and contentious issue that has led to considerable legal commentary on the interpretation of the statutory provisions set out in Section of the Equality Act 2010. 119. Before the burden of proof provisions, the leading authority was King v Great British-China Centre. In that case the Court of Appeal in England held that the Tribunal had been entitled to draw an inference of discrimination as the's tribunal cases tagged with race discrimination in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.