Loading…

Working time regulations cases against ETEC Group (First Respondent) Alliance Lesiure Services Ltd (Second Respondent) South Norfolk (Third Respondent) Interaction Recruitment (Fourth Respondent) — employment tribunal data | Tribunal Watch

Employer × claim type

Working time regulations cases against ETEC Group (First Respondent) Alliance Lesiure Services Ltd (Second Respondent) South Norfolk (Third Respondent) Interaction Recruitment (Fourth Respondent)

Tribunal Watch has indexed 1 case involving working time regulations claims against ETEC Group (First Respondent) Alliance Lesiure Services Ltd (Second Respondent) South Norfolk (Third Respondent) Interaction Recruitment (Fourth Respondent), out of 1 total case on record for this employer. See also all working time regulations cases across every employer.

Working time regulations cases: 1
Total awarded: —
Share of employer caseload: 100%

All working time regulations cases against ETEC Group (First Respondent) Alliance Lesiure Services Ltd (Second Respondent) South Norfolk (Third Respondent) Interaction Recruitment (Fourth Respondent)

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
3335179/2018	18 June 2019	England & Wales	Mr M Holt	Breach of contract, Disability discrimination, Other, Unfair dismissal, Working time regulations	—

Methodology

This page lists the subset of ETEC Group (First Respondent) Alliance Lesiure Services Ltd (Second Respondent) South Norfolk (Third Respondent) Interaction Recruitment (Fourth Respondent)'s tribunal cases tagged with working time regulations in the §4.4 claim-type taxonomy. A single judgment frequently combines multiple claim types, so the same case may appear on more than one claim-type page. Award figures are taken from the remedy section of each judgment where present; cases without a quantified award — because the tribunal only determined liability, or because the remedy hearing is pending — are listed with no award amount. See how the data is built.