Employer file
Since 2017, . It is their position that even taken at its highest, the claim under section would not be successful as it only alleges a potential detriment, no actual detriment. It was submitted that if allowed, that amendment were allowed, the claim under section ERA is meritless and that it would not be in line with the overriding objective for that claim to proceed. It was the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | Disability discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4110004/2021 | 14 June 2022 | Scotland | Mrs Natalie Ann Wright | Disability discrimination | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.