Employment tribunal cases against . It was submitted that that proposed amendment introduces a new head of claim, not included in the ET 1. Reliance was placed on the legal tests set out section requiring different enquiry and consideration by the Tribunal than the other claims brought. It was submitted that allowing the proposed amendments would incur additional time and expense for the

Since 2017, . It was submitted that that proposed amendment introduces a new head of claim, not included in the ET 1. Reliance was placed on the legal tests set out section requiring different enquiry and consideration by the Tribunal than the other claims brought. It was submitted that allowing the proposed amendments would incur additional time and expense for the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Disability discrimination

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.

. It was submitted that that proposed amendment introduces a new head of claim, not included in the ET 1. Reliance was placed on the legal tests set out section requiring different enquiry and consideration by the Tribunal than the other claims brought. It was submitted that allowing the proposed amendments would incur additional time and expense for the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch