Loading page content.
TopEmployer file
Since 2017, Mentioning that in her agenda form completed for the initial TCMPH. There was no indication in the Note issued following the September TCMPH that any issue in respect of requirement to amend the claim may arise 4110004/2021 Page 53. I considered the balance of prejudice to each party should the amendments be allowed. It was not suggested that the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.
| # | Claim type | Cases | Relative share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Disability discrimination | 1 |
| Case ref. | Decided | Jurisdiction | Claimant | Claim types | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4110004/2021 | 14 June 2022 | Scotland | Mrs Natalie Ann Wright | Disability discrimination | — |
Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.