Employment tribunal cases against Mentioning that in her agenda form completed for the initial TCMPH. There was no indication in the Note issued following the September TCMPH that any issue in respect of requirement to amend the claim may arise 4110004/2021 Page 53. I considered the balance of prejudice to each party should the amendments be allowed. It was not suggested that the

Since 2017, Mentioning that in her agenda form completed for the initial TCMPH. There was no indication in the Note issued following the September TCMPH that any issue in respect of requirement to amend the claim may arise 4110004/2021 Page 53. I considered the balance of prejudice to each party should the amendments be allowed. It was not suggested that the has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Disability discrimination

Indexed: 5 May 2026

Cases by claim type

1 distinct category

#	Claim type	Cases
01	Disability discrimination	1

All cases

1 case · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
4110004/2021	14 June 2022	Scotland	Mrs Natalie Ann Wright	Disability discrimination	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Outcomes and compensation are not yet populated for every case — see how the data is built.

Mentioning that in her agenda form completed for the initial TCMPH. There was no indication in the Note issued following the September TCMPH that any issue in respect of requirement to amend the claim may arise 4110004/2021 Page 53. I considered the balance of prejudice to each party should the amendments be allowed. It was not suggested that the — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch