Loading…

Mr D Alstin, Operations Director This has been a remote hearing to which the parties did not object via CVP. A full face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all matters could be determined in a remote hearing. — employment tribunal cases | Tribunal Watch

Employer file

Mr D Alstin, Operations Director This has been a remote hearing to which the parties did not object via CVP. A full face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all matters could be determined in a remote hearing.

Since 2017, Mr D Alstin, Operations Director This has been a remote hearing to which the parties did not object via CVP. A full face-to-face hearing was not held because it was not practicable and all matters could be determined in a remote hearing. has appeared as a respondent in 1 employment tribunal case, with £0 in total awards recorded against the employer.

Indexed: 2 August 2026

Total cases: 1
Total awarded against: £0
Largest award: —
Most common claim: Whistleblowing

Cases by claim type

2 distinct categories

#	Claim type	Cases	Relative share
01	Whistleblowing	1
02	Unfair dismissal	1

All cases

1 case · page 1 of 1 · chronological

Case ref.	Decided	Jurisdiction	Claimant	Claim types	Award
3303947/2020	4 January 2020	England & Wales	Ms J May, solicitor For the	Whistleblowing, Unfair dismissal	—

Methodology

Data extracted from published employment tribunal judgments on gov.uk. Case reference, decision date, judge, venue and claim categories come from structured metadata. Claimant and respondent names are extracted from the judgment PDF text, and a second LLM-assisted pass adds per-claim outcomes, key findings, and any compensation awarded. Many UK tribunal decisions are liability-only — the remedy is set at a later hearing — so a case can correctly show an outcome with no award figure. See how the data is built.